Fascination About h4831sc load data

Fascination About h4831sc load data

Blog Article

Considering the fact that there isn't going to look like any "official" Load Data around for this Load, can several of you offer a starting point with this combination and things to consider when Doing the job this Load up?

Obviously, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of different large amount figures, but I believe I realize why. It's a litigation-driven earth, and a few fool would undoubtedly deduce that he could combine H380 and H110 and think of his very own personalized combination of powder. What a earth.

Liberalism; The extremely hard however accepted notion that it is fully doable to select up a turd because of the cleanse conclusion.

Which means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, discover a commencing load when only one is mentioned for a certain cartridge.

INgunner54 stated: It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Located a node and shot some groups.

I've utilised H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without big difference. The one thing will be the small Lower provides somewhat more Room. Superior luck!gun)

Any one loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcome, any data you could share? Must also mention I have some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I wish to examination out, When you have information on that in addition.

In truth, It is even a smart idea to again down and do the job up securely any time you go from 1 h4831 vs h4831sc whole lot to a different large amount of the exact same powder.

dioni.a.312 stated: In my experience the only actual big difference is that the shortcut meters improved by way of reloading machines. After It really is loaded theres no functional variance. I've read that the shortcut can have a small little bit more quickly melt away level but it seems insignificant. Simply click to increase...

Furthermore, it goes on to express that as a result of fshorter grains, that load density may very well h4831sc load data be marginally higher.

Kansas Metropolis, MO I'd personally grab no matter what is out there at this time. I’ve used each however with my drop by load and didn’t see something distinct effectiveness intelligent.

Like Everybody mentioned, the SC h4831 vs h4831sc stands for “limited Slice” and is a bit easier to meter. Tends to make you issue why they would nevertheless make the standard just one.

I typically always receive the sc version. Utilizing a powder measure it hangs up a lot less as a result of shorter kernels and I think permits more regular metering so less time you're taking trickling in the last little bit of cost to create weight. So generally the SC will save you moments

This looks as if a great spot to divulge a bit more facts on Hodgdon, H4831 particularly...I when had a pound of H4831SC sit about the shelf for a variety of decades. It absolutely was procured before Hodgdon began publicizing the "Intense" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a part.